Independent public-records project, separate from the State of Colorado and from every party and campaign. Who runs this
COLORADO WORKS BETTER™ Taxpayer Shareholder Portal Get updates
CDOTI-70 Floyd Hill Improvement Project
All projects
FACT A Honesty Framework The label says how we know the figure. The grade rates the source record, not the project. The grade rates the source record, not the project.

CDOT · Transportation

I-70 Floyd Hill Improvement Project

Westbound third lane, new canyon viaduct & interchange rebuild (8 mi, Clear Creek County). Timeline 2023–2029.

Est. total cost
$905M
Delivery stage
● Underway
Paid so far, to whom PENDING

Your take on this project

Latest public update

CDOT's 2025 cost-to-deliver estimate is $905M, up from the 2020 estimate of $700M, citing construction and material costs.

Open questions for the state ANALYSIS

  • What are the specific cost drivers behind the rise from $700M (2020) to $905M (2025)?
  • Is the 2026 excavation season on track to hold the westbound 2027 opening?

Fiscal position

Total project cost$905M

Total cost & funding are drawn from the official record(s) listed below.

Spend-to-date: not published. Colorado does not publish what it has spent on this project, so this field is left blank rather than estimated. It will fill from TOPS/CORE vendor expenditure data as payments are matched to projects.

Milestones

  • Design & NEPA complete — 2021
  • Construction began — July 2023
  • Rock excavation & bridge structures — through 2026
  • Westbound new alignment open — end 2027
  • Eastbound alignment open — end 2028
  • Full completion — 2029

Estimate, first to current FACT

first public estimate → current+$205M · +29%
2020 CDOT estimate → 2025 CDOT estimate$700M → $905M
Watchlist average drift+50% per project · +23% dollar-weighted
Both endpoints are drawn from the source records below; the change, percentage, and average are our arithmetic (CALC). The average covers the 5 of 50 tracked projects with two published estimates — for the rest, the state has published a single figure, so their drift is unknowable, not zero. Estimates move in both directions — we show the honest record either way.

Who is being paid FACT

Funding sourceState (SB 267 / Transportation Commission funds) plus federal INFRA/MEGA grants.
VendorContract / valuePaid to dateConfidence
WITHHELDConstruction manager / general contractor (CM/GC)$905M programPENDINGA
WITHHELDLead design engineer — 6-year design contract (2022)$31M designPENDINGB
The money is published; the names are held. Each row below carries the contract value, what has been paid to date so far as it is published, and our confidence grade — the same figures as always, from the same official records. What is withheld is the vendor's name, the record link that names it, and the campaign-finance search that sat beside it. That is a deliberate decision taken pending legal review, not a figure we could not find: a blank cell would have said the opposite. What WITHHELD means

Source records

Follow this project

I-70 Floyd Hill Improvement Project

Point a phone camera at this to open the project.