Colorado · Fiscal notes
Bills and Laws
Updated Oct 12
What a fiscal note is
Colorado prices its own bills before it votes on them. A fiscal note is what the legislature's own nonpartisan staff estimated a bill would cost the state, written again each time the bill changes. This page has read the note on 7,078 of the 7,310 bills listed, at the first version of the estimate and at the last; the rest have no note in this record yet.
Every figure here is a forecast at a version, not a cost.
Find a bill
Type a bill number, or a word from the title. The boxes filter; they never answer — you pick the bill.
Press / from anywhere on this page to jump to the box. When your typing leaves exactly one bill, Enter opens it.
7,310 of 7,310 bills · showing the first 150 — narrow the list, or add more below
"Moved" is the distance between what the state first said a bill would cost and what it last said. A negative figure is a saving, not a mistake. A note books reduced spending as a negative expenditure, and the sign here is the publisher's own. "At introduction" is the earliest note in this cache and "Latest" the last one. The last one is often not a final note. A final note is not guaranteed, even for a bill that became law.
A fiscal note is a forecast at a version. It is not a cost. Every figure above carries the date it was written and the version it describes. What a bill actually cost is a different question, and Colorado does not publish the answer.
This is the one table on this site that needs JavaScript. Every other table here works without it. This one cannot: sending all 7,310 rows at once would make the page too large to load, so the search box, the filters, the sorting and all 16 sessions are put together in your browser.
The finding
Most price tags never move. The ones that do, mostly fall.
Comparing each bill's first estimate with its last needs both to carry a figure. 3,675 bills do. Here is what happened to them.
Of the 1,081 bills whose estimate moved at all, down beats up by about 2.1 to 1. The most common thing that happens to a Colorado bill's price tag is nothing. The second most common is that it is taken out of the bill.
2,213 bills had no state fiscal impact
Their first note prints no impact table, because the state's own analysts found the bill costs the state nothing, and the note says so. That is a finding, not a gap. It is the largest single group here, and it is counted on its own so no other total can absorb it.
512 bills were priced in words
Older notes often print a sentence where a figure would go — "Workload increase and potential cost increases." That is a real published finding. It is carried as the sentence the state wrote, labeled PENDING (qualitative), and it is never turned into a zero.
18 bills were priced only if something happens
Their only table is headed Conditional State Fiscal Impacts — figures stated for a condition that may not hold. A conditional is a different claim from a forecast. So these are kept apart from the bills with a figure and from the bills with none.
The record
What is here
Every bill gets a fiscal note. There is no dollar threshold, so a bill the state expects to cost nothing gets a note that says so.
232 of the 7,310 bills have no note in this cache at all. They are listed with that reason rather than dropped. A bill missing from a list of every bill is the one thing a reader cannot see.
The Outcome column starts in 2025
This page reads what happened to a bill out of the fiscal note. Only a note written after the bill was disposed of prints it. Where a bill in 2025 or 2026 has no such note, the page takes the ending from the bill history on the legislature's own page for that bill: the Governor's signature or veto, a committee voting to “postpone indefinitely”, or a floor vote that lost it. Nothing else. So 1,310 of the 7,310 bills here carry an outcome. Every one of them sits in a 2025 or 2026 session. The other 6,000 are marked Not stated. That is this page not having read it, not the state not having published it. The legislature prints every bill's disposition on the bill's own page, and every bill here links to that page. So the outcome filter narrows you to 2025 and 2026 as well.
What this page will not tell you
Three questions, and one of them has no answer anywhere
What a bill actually cost
No Colorado source reports spending bill by bill. A fiscal note estimates what a bill will cost. The Long Bill — the state's yearly spending act — gives money to departments. Neither says what was spent because of one bill. So the question a reader most wants answered cannot be answered, and no number is offered in its place.
What all these bills add up to
Refused, and not pending better data. A dollar total of these estimates is dominated by single bills in every sample measured. On one sample it moved +83.2% across 200 bills and +3.8% with the one largest swing removed. A total like that is a statement about one bill wearing the clothes of a statement about the legislature.
The per-bill direction is stable. That is what is published instead.
Bills before 2016
PENDING Notes exist for every Colorado bill since 1989, on an older state system that still answers. It is recorded here so the gap is a known absence rather than a silent one. It has not been read yet.
There is no scorecard here and no party column. Adding up the estimated cost of the bills a member sponsored would invent a measure and dress it as a fact. A party column would make everything above it read as a partisan scorecard. This site is neutral infrastructure.
How this is read
Method
Which note comes first
Each bill's notes are put in order by the date each note prints about itself. Where two notes carry the same date, the FINAL banner an older note prints at the top of page one breaks the tie. Where neither settles it — 26 bills — both notes are shown and no direction is claimed. A direction there would be a coin toss wearing a percentage.
This matters more than it sounds. The cached file names do not run in date order: the two are the other way round for every session before 2026. Read them by file name rather than by printed date and "down beats up 2.1 to 1" becomes the opposite claim. Every other check on the page still passes.
Which figure is compared
The comparison is state expenditures in the budget year — the fiscal year the note itself labels as the budget year. Notes print two, three or four years. The column count also changes between versions of the same note. So the year is bound to the ruler the note prints, never to a column position.
What each note is checked against
Where a note prints a fund breakdown, the fund lines must add up to the total the note prints. That total must also equal the figure in the summary table. Both checks run on every read. A note that fails is reported, never quietly dropped.
What a bill is about is the legislature's own summary
Each bill record opens with the Bill Summary written by Colorado Legislative Council Staff, printed word for word from the bill's own page on leg.colorado.gov with the date it was read. This site does not write, shorten or rephrase it. The summary says which version of the bill it describes, and that note is printed beside it. Where the legislature publishes no summary, the record says NOT PUBLISHED and the space stays blank.
Sponsors are shown as the legislature's own identifier
The record gives each sponsor as a web address fragment, such as chris-degruy-kennedy.
Turning that into a name means guessing where the capital letters go, and this site does not
guess about a person's name. Each one links to the legislature's own page, which prints it
properly.
Source
Fiscal notes and vote records are published by the Colorado General Assembly at leg.colorado.gov (opens in a new tab). Notes are required by Joint Rule 22, with House Rule 32A and Senate Rule 25(e). The notes on this page were taken from each bill's own page on the legislature's site on 17 August 2026; the notes of the 139 bills that changed since then were taken again on 2026-09-23; the notes of 4 more bills were taken on 2026-09-24.
Local Education Provider Workforce Housing
Concerning funding for the creation of local education provider workforce housing by local education providers.
Cost estimates
Every figure here is an estimate by Legislative Council Staff on the date shown, about the version of the bill in front of them that day. It is not a cost.
The appropriation
The bill requires money it does not carry — the note says an appropriation is required and does not say the bill includes one.
An appropriation is money the legislature sets aside. It is not money spent.
The appropriation field, read from the note: The Workforce Housing Assistance Fund is continuously appropriated to the Departments of Education and Local Affairs; however, the Departments of Treasury and Law would have required reappropriations totaling $353,475 in FY 2026-27. See State Appropriations section.
Bill summary
Section 4 of the bill creates the 'Building Excellent Teacher and Employee Residences Act' (BETER). BETER creates a new school district financing opportunity for the development of housing for teachers and other school district and public school staff (workforce housing).
The bill creates an application process by which a school district (applicant) may apply to the workforce housing assistance board (board) for financial assistance in connection with developing a workforce housing project. The division of public school capital construction assistance within the department of education (division of public school capital construction assistance) and the division of housing within the department of local affairs (division of housing) shall assist applicants in identifying workforce housing needs and in submitting applications to the board. No later than June 1, the board, with the support of the division of housing and division of public school capital construction assistance, shall review these applications according to guidelines that the board establishes and creates an initial prioritized list of workforce housing projects to award financial assistance. The board shall submit this initial prioritized list to the state board of education and the state housing board for comment. No later than July 15, the board shall determine a final prioritized list of projects for which the board will provide financial assistance.
The board may only award financial assistance to an applicant for a workforce housing project if:
- The board determines that the project complies with affordability, tenancy, and environmental and building requirements established by the board; and
- Unless the board grants an exemption, the applicant provides matching money in an amount at least equal to the portion of the total development cost of the workforce housing project that can be financed with and supported by net operating income generated from the project.
The board may only provide an amount of financial assistance to an applicant for a workforce housing project that is equal to or less than the portion of the amount of the workforce housing project's total development cost that exceeds the amount that the applicant can finance and support with the workforce housing project's net operating income.
The board may provide financial assistance to an applicant for a workforce housing project by awarding matching grants that are paid out of the workforce housing assistance fund (fund) or by instructing the state treasurer to enter into a financed purchase of an asset or certificate of participation agreement. In this context, the financed purchase of an asset or certificate of participation agreement means a lease-purchase agreement between the state treasurer and a trustee pursuant to which:
- The state makes rental payments that include principal and interest components; and
- The trustee, pursuant to an indenture of trust, creates certificates of participation evidencing undivided interests in the payments made by the state under the lease-purchase agreement.
Any payment obligation of the state as part of a financed purchase of an asset or certificate of participation agreement is subject to annual appropriation and does not create an indebtedness or multiple fiscal year financial obligation of the state within the meaning of any provision of the state constitution or state statute.
If the state treasurer enters into a financed purchase of an asset or certificate of participation agreement, the board shall enter into a sub-financed purchase of an asset or certificate of participation agreement for the workforce housing project with the applicant that will use the workforce housing. The sub-financed purchase of an asset or certificate of participation agreement must:
- Require the applicant to perform for the state all duties of the state to maintain and operate the workforce housing project and to make periodic rental payments to the state or otherwise make a payment to the state in the amount of the matching money required for the award of financial assistance; and
- Provide for the transfer of ownership of the workforce housing from the state to the applicant upon the fulfillment of both the state's obligations under the financed purchase of an asset or certificate of participation agreement and the applicant's obligations under the sub-financed purchase of an asset or certificate of participation agreement.
The board is required to present an annual written report to the education and finance committees of the house of representatives and the senate regarding the provision of financial assistance to applicants. The board is also required to post a similar report on the department of education's website.
Sections 5, 6, 7, and 8 establish the funding mechanism for the fund. The state constitution restricts the use of the principal of the public school fund and only allows for the use of public school fund interest and income. Sections 6 and 7 clarify that public school fund interest and income includes realized and unrealized gains and directs the transfer of the lesser of an amount of interest and income equal to 2.5% of the total value of the public school fund after making currently required interest and income distributions from the public school fund or $40 million to the state public school fund. Section 5 creates the public school fund income stabilization account within the public school fund and directs the treasurer to credit the difference between the amount transferred from the public school fund to the state public school fund as described in section 6 and $40 million to the account. The uses of the account are limited to supplementing payment from or the principal of the public school fund. Section 8 directs the state treasurer to annually transfer an amount equal to the amount transferred from the public school fund to the state public school fund pursuant to section 6 from the state education fund to the fund.
Section 1 expands school district powers concerning the development and financing of workforce housing. Specifically, section 1 allows for school districts to:
- Acquire, construct, improve, own, operate, lease, and lease-purchase workforce housing;
- Issue bonds to finance workforce housing;
- Enter into contracts with public entities and private parties to finance workforce housing; and
- Create enterprises for the acquisition, construction, improvement, ownership, operation, leasing, and lease-purchasing of workforce housing.
Section 1 also describes the characteristics of bonds issued by school district-created enterprises for the purpose of financing workforce housing.
Section 2 adds certain school district and school district enterprise lease agreements, lease-purchase agreements, and revenue bonds entered into or issued in connection with financing workforce housing to the state intercept program.
Sections 3, 9, and 10 grant the division of public school capital construction assistance, the state treasurer, and the division of housing the powers necessary to implement the bill.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
FACT Bill summary by Colorado Legislative Council Staff, read 2026-09-23. Printed as published, word for word. Source: leg.colorado.gov (opens in a new tab)
What this bill appropriates
Two totals, two bases. An appropriation is money the legislature authorized to be spent, not money spent. For FY 2026-27, the Long Bill alone appropriates $49,560,763,693 FACT. The Appropriations Report from the Joint Budget Committee staff adds the other bills of the session: $49,694,444,712 FACT.
The General Fund is $17,351,445,407 FACT in the Long Bill alone and $17,461,279,123 FACT in the report. Both are correct, and we never add them. See both totals, with their sources.
Sources: HB26-1410 as enacted (opens in a new tab), chapter 436 of the Session Laws, read 8 October 2026. The FY 2026-27 Appropriations Report (opens in a new tab), read 11 October 2026.